Drawing for Serial No. 76313888

USPTO serial 76313888

Serial No. 76313888

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76313888?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph M. Tener

RALPH M TENER MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC11350 RANDOM HILLS RD STE 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030-7421UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035management consulting, assessment, and support services to businesses and government agencies in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practicesACTIVEMay 31, 1999
041training services, namely, courses, seminars, conferences, workshops, materials, tools, and multi-media presentations, in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practicesACTIVEMay 31, 1999
042research services, policy evaluation and development, preparation of guides, handbooks, white papers, briefing papers, research reports, issue analyses, training materials, requirements analyses, alternatives analyses, cost-benefit analyses, requests for proposals, and proposals, computer services, namely providing on-line publications and information, application service provider featuring software, and knowledge management services, all in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practices; assessment of organizations and procurements and facilitation of groups to identify and publicize opportunities for reforms, innovations, initiatives, and improvements in contracts and contracting processes and to recommend methods for implementing such reforms, innovations, initiatives, and improvementsACTIVEMay 31, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 12, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance