USPTO serial 76313972
TRONICUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRONICUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, T2P 4Z4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M. FREEDMAN
SUSAN M FREEDMAN FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Equipment, truck, ship and plane logistical services, namely demand planning and forecasting, order management, transportation planning and management, shipment tracking and related problem resolutions, supply chain management outsourcing services, namely network modeling and optimization, global information visibility and global network monitoring and alerting services; inventory management, namely tracking inventory prior to, during and after shipping and inventory planning and optimization services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Multi-operator, rail-based services, namely road-rail, ship-rail, and plane-rail customized loading, offloading and reloading services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |