Drawing for JUMEIRAH INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 76314153

JUMEIRAH INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUMEIRAH INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HENRY KLEIN

HENRY KLEIN LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5620UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Business cards; brochures in the fields of hotel and accommodations services, hospitality, food and beverages, health and beauty, public relations, marketing, advertising, business management and administration, and the retail service industry; printed publications, namely, journals, magazines and catalogues in the fields of hotel and accommodation services, hospitality, food and beverage, health and beauty, public relations, marketing, advertising, business management and business administration, and the retail services industry; cardboard boxes; cardboard tubes; paper and articles of paper, namely, stationary, diary's, blotters, writing paper, envelopes; office supplies, namely, pens, pencils, felt pens, propelling pencils, ballpoint pens, paperweights, letter racks, paper files, and index files; maps; and playing cardsACTIVE—
035Public relations services, namely, publication of publicity texts, publicity agency services for others; marketing services, namely, conducting marketing research and studies; advertising services, namely, dissemination of advertising materials, rental and purchase of advertising mediums and time, conducting direct mail, outdoor, television, radio and print advertising campaigns and performing tracking services to analyze information and effectiveness of such advertising campaigns; and business consultancy servicesACTIVE—
036Real estate services, namely, real estate management, appraisals, real estate leasing, real estate rentals; banking services; financial information, analysis, evaluation, management and consultancy services; fund and capital investment services; securities, stocks and bonds brokerage services; insurance brokerage, information, consultancy and underwriting servicesACTIVE—
043Hotel services and temporary accommodation services; restaurant services; cafe services; cocktail lounge and bar services; health spa services; beauty salon services; hair dressing salonsACTIVE—
044Health spa services, beauty salon services and hair dressing salon servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 28, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance