USPTO serial 76314154
JUMEIRAH BEACH HOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUMEIRAH BEACH HOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY KLEIN
HENRY KLEIN LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | BROCHURES IN THE FIELDS OF HOTEL AND ACCOMMODATION SERVICES, HOSPITALITY, FOOD AND BEVERAGE, HEALTH AND BEAUTY, PUBLIC RELATIONS, MARKETING, ADVERTISING, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION, AND THE RETAIL SERVICE INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PUBLICATION OF PUBLICITY TEXTS, PUBLICITY AGENCY SERVICES FOR OTHERS; MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING MARKETING RESEARCH AND STUDIES; ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATERIALS, RENTAL AND PURCHASE OF ADVERTISING MEDIUMS AND TIME, CONDUCTING DIRECT MAIL, OUTDOOR, TELEVISION, RADIO AND PRINT ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS AND PERFORMING TRACKING SERVICES TO ANALYZE INFORMATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SUCH ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS; AND BUSINESS CONSULTANCY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | HOTEL SERVICES AND TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION SERVICES; RESTAURANT SERVICES; CAFE SERVICES; COCKTAIL LOUNGE AND BAR SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | HEALTH SPA SERVICES AND BEAUTY SALON SERVICES AND HAIR DRESSING SALONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JUMEIRAH BEACH RESORT LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named JUMEIRAH BEACH HOTEL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |