USPTO serial 76314223
ALL THE ANSWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL THE ANSWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD E HEWSON
DONALD E HEWSON MARKS & CLERK350 BURNHAMTHORPE RD W STE 402MISSISSAUGA, ON L5B 3J1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | trivia board game; sets of answer and question cards for a trivia board game | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |