USPTO serial 76314698
LEONARD THE MONKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEONARD THE MONKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario K2A 2L4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore D. Lienesch
THEODORE D LIENESCH COURTHOUSETHOMPSON HINE LLP10 W 2ND STDAYTON, OH 45402-1791Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely, educational computer games for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, children's books; Souvenirs, namely, paper banners, paper pennants, paper badges, paper flags, and pens | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Souvenirs, namely, plastic pennants, banners, badges, and flags | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Souvenirs, namely, cloth pennants, banners, and flags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops, t-shirts, muscle shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, pullovers, blouses, jackets, tunics, coats, vests, jerseys, raincoats, ponchos, shells, uniforms, ties, trousers, pants, jogging suits, exercise pants, exercise suits, sweatpants, smocks, shorts, overalls, underwear, boxer shorts, socks, pajamas, belts, gloves, Halloween and masquerade costumes, wrist bands, and bandanas; Footwear, namely, shoes, socks, sneakers, boots, and sandals; Headgear, namely, hats, caps, headbands, toques and visors | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Dolls; Board Games; Toys, namely, toy action figures and accessories therefor, plush toys, squeezable squeaking toys, stuffed toys, wind-up toys, wind-up walking toys, and bath toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online services, namely, online retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, headgear, printed publications, toys, dolls, board games, software, and souvenirs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of on-going animated television programs for children; Production and distribution of television programming via cable, satellite, and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leonard the Monkey Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEONARD THE MONKEY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |