USPTO serial 76314741
GUIDANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUIDANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | SPONSORING AND MANAGING INVESTMENT FUNDS; MUTUAL FUND DISTRIBUTION; INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS; CREDIT CARD SERVICES AND DEBIT CARD SERVICES, SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDING THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR OTHERS, PROVIDING VENTURE CAPITAL AND CAPITAL INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES TO NEW AND EXISTING COMPANIES; AND FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK RELATED DEVELOPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |