USPTO serial 76314765
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Brown
James L. Brown Swanson & Bratschun, L.L.C.8210 Southpark TerraceLittleton, CO 80120UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital video camera, computer, geographic locator system, transponders, and computer software for acquiring and storing, searching, retrieving, or matching retinal images of animals, namely, humans, non-human domesticated companion animals, non-human animals for research, non-human animals used for production or consumption, birds, and aquatic animals, to or from a computer database | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 010 | Veterinary apparatus for identification and verification of livestock and companion animals consisting of a camera, computer, geographic locator system, and transponders for acquiring and storing, searching, retrieving, or matching retinal images of animals, namely, humans, non-human domesticated companion animals, non-human animals for research, non-human animals used for production or consumption, birds, and aquatic animals, to or from a computer database | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 13, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |