USPTO serial 76314772
OPTIBRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2929213Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2005
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTIBRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Brown
James L. Brown Swanson & Bratschun, L.L.C.8210 Southpark TerraceLittleton, CO 80120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | IMAGE ACQUISITION SERVICES, COMPUTER DATABASE MAINTENANCE SERVICES, AND SEARCHING, RETRIEVING, AND MATCHING SERVICES NAMELY OF RETINAL IMAGES OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS FOR IDENTIFICATION, VERIFICATION, AND TRACKING MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |