USPTO serial 76314873
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Sprinkle
STEVEN R SPRINKLE GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP1221 S MOPAC EXPY STE 400AUSTIN, TX 78746-6875UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that supports communications over public and private computer networks via wired and wireless telecommunications devices and telephones; computer software and electric communications switches; computer software used for the creation, securing, enhancement, modification, transmission, reception, exchange, storage, and synchronization of information, messages, audio and video data, multimedia files, photographic and graphic files and images, and e-mail with or without attached files and images, over wired and/or wireless links and connections; computer interfaces that work with either public or private portal and communication services to provide wired and wireless access to and the ability to create, secure, enhance, modify, transmit, receive, exchange, store and synchronize text data, audio and video data files, multimedia files, photographic and graphic files and images, and e-mail with or without attached files and images; computer software for supporting business to business communications and sales via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely providing technical support for efficient and convenient communications between individuals and enterprises over public and private networks via wired and wireless telecommunications devices and telephones; providing technical support for computer software and systems used for the creation, securing, enhancement, modification, transmission, reception, exchange, storage, and synchronization of information, messages, audio and video data, multimedia files, photographic and graphic files and images, and e-mail with or without attached files and images, over wired and/or wireless links and connections; providing technical support to computer interfaces with a public or private portal and communication services to provide wired and wireless access to and the ability to create, secure, enhance, modify, transmit, receive, exchange, store and synchronize information, audio and video data and files, multimedia files, photographic and graphic files and images, and e-mail with or without attached files and images; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; delivery of wireless digital messages; electronic mail services; and computer software consultation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |