USPTO serial 76314916
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUZANNE M. TURNER
SALLY M ABEL REETFENWICK & W LLPSILICON VLY CTR 801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing referrals and matching buyers and sellers in the fields of art, architecture, business, finance, real estate, education, career planning, computers and the internet, film, music, theater, celebrities, gaming, law, medicine, health and fitness, home and parenting, counseling, psychology, astrology, psychic readings and romance | ABANDONED | Oct 9, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |