USPTO serial 76315086
REHRIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3639955Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REHRIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth F. Janda
ELIZABETH F JANDA BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR, 22nd FloorSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL MATERIAL HANDLING APPARATUS MADE OF PLASTIC, NAMELY, CONTAINERS AND COLLAPSIBLE CONTAINERS, CRATES, TRAYS, MERCHANDISE DISPLAY RACKS, RECYCLING BINS, PALLETS, AND TOP FRAMES FOR BULK PALLETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | TRASH RECEPTACLES, NAMELY, TRASH CANS, RECYCLING CANS, AND WASTE CANS MADE OF PLASTIC | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1992 |
| 040 | CUSTOM PLASTIC INJECTION MOLDING SERVICES, NAMELY, CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF MATERIAL HANDLING APPARATUS, NAMELY, CONTAINERS, COLLAPSIBLE CONTAINERS, CRATES, TRAYS, MERCHANDISE DISPLAY RACKS, TRASH RECEPTACLES, RECYCLING BINS, PALLETS, AND TOP FRAMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named REHRIG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |