USPTO serial 76315448
ANDINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2787696Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2003
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANDINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
(1084) Buenos Aires, AR
(1084) Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Mercanti
MICHAEL N. MERCANTI LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP475 PARK AVENUE SOUTH 15TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed olives | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |