USPTO serial 76315455
DIEPOTHAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3117469Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIEPOTHAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
49356 Diepholz, DE
Other trademarks owned by P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
49356 Diepholz, DE
Other trademarks owned by P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
49356 Diepholz, DE
Other trademarks owned by P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Jordan
FRANK J JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG122 E 42ND ST RM 4000NEW YORK, NY 10168-0069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Extruded, case molded or injection-molded plastic parts of construction machines, conveying and transporting machines, printing machines and cutting machines for paper, namely, seals, profiles, cutting strips, coupling elements, scrapers, membranes, rolls for hoists, lifts, elevators and conveyors, wheels, spring elements, damping elements, hoses, screens, pump parts, namely seals and couplings, housings for hoists, doctor blade strips, doctor blade beds, scraping strips used on machinery which moves along a rough base and are abraded, embossing bolsters used as upper molding dies which press sheet metal into a mold when parts are press formed, and stop buffers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 29, 1996 |
| 017 | Extruded plastic in the form of bars, blocks, pellets, rods, sheets and tubes for use in manufacturing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 29, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by P + S Polyurethan-Elastomere GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DIEPOTHAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |