USPTO serial 76315634
METAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with METAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL R. GILMAN
JEFFREY DWECK THE LAW FIRM OF JEFFREY S DWECK, PCSTE 1013100 W 33RD STNEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, hair jewelry, watches, watch bands and straps, clocks, key chain watches, cuff links, tie clips, tie pins, tie tacks, pendants and charms, sun dials, and precious and semi-precious gemstones; and items made of precious metal, namely, ashtrays, belt buckles for clothing, jewelry boxes and cases, candle holders, candle rings and candle snuffers, candle sticks, cigarette cases, cigarette holders, cigarette lighters, figurines and statuettes, key chains, money clips, napkin rings, nut crackers, piggy banks, serving platters, tea infusers, sculptures, tea servers, tea pots, and trophies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |