USPTO serial 76315692
URBAN IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBAN IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr
STEVEN M COYLE CANTOR COLBURN LLP55 GRIFFIN RD SBLOOMFIELD, CT 06002-1353UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional business consultancy services, professional advisory services, business information services in the field of urban planning; business appraisal services; marketing studies and research; computerized database management; providing an on-line computer database featuring trade information in the field of urban planning; dissemination of advertising matter; dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Education and training services in the field of town planning; publication of texts, other than advertising texts | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Database development services; updating of computer software for others; conducting feasibility studies in the field of land and regional development; urban planning consultation; providing information in the field of urban planning; professional consultant services, technical project studies and engineering works valuation in the field of town planning; providing information in the field of town planning; creation, operation and maintenance of a social club devoted to expressing the need for, and importance of, urban planning; promoting public awareness in the field of regional development | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUIGUER, THIERRY
- Other trademarks owned by QUIGUER, THIERRY
- Other trademarks owned by QUIGUER, VALERIE
- Other trademarks owned by QUIGUER, VALERIE
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named URBAN IT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |