USPTO serial 76315746
"TELEFUTURO" TENEMOS MUCHO QUE VER CONTIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with "TELEFUTURO" TENEMOS MUCHO QUE VER CONTIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Y O'HIGGINS, ASUNCION, PY
Y O'HIGGINS, ASUNCION, PY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Weild III
Jacqueline M. Lesser White & Case LLP1155 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FLNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES NAMELY, THE BROADCASTING AND RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |