Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76315793?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76315793. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COCK SUCKER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76315793, the listed owner(s) include: Fox, Marsha.

What is USPTO serial number 76315793?

Serial number 76315793 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COCK SUCKER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover COCK SUCKER?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76315793

COCK SUCKER

Q: What is the current status of COCK SUCKER?

COCK SUCKER (76315793) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 24, 2001
Status date: Mar 28, 2013
Registration date: —
Examiner: CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCK SUCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Fox, Marsha
Walterboro, SC
Other trademarks owned by Fox, Marsha

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Bressman

Michael B. Bressman Vanderbilt Legal Clinic131 21st Avenue SouthNashville, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Chocolate suckers molded in the shape of a rooster	ACTIVE	Nov 15, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 2, 2013	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 28, 2013	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 28, 2013	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 12, 2012	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2012	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Nov 15, 2011	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
May 24, 2011	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
May 23, 2011	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Mar 24, 2011	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 24, 2011	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 26, 2010	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Aug 31, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED	—
Aug 31, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED	—
Aug 30, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Aug 25, 2010	DMCC	DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED	—
Jul 9, 2010	DMCC	DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED	—
Jul 9, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 9, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 7, 2010	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 7, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 1, 2010	PGRR	PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED	—
Jun 1, 2010	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
May 24, 2010	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
May 24, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 17, 2010	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2010	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 16, 2010	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 7, 2009	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
May 6, 2009	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Apr 30, 2009	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Apr 27, 2009	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Apr 27, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 23, 2009	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Feb 23, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2006	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Nov 16, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 13, 2006	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Nov 13, 2006	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Nov 13, 2006	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Nov 13, 2006	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
May 6, 2005	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Aug 16, 2004	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Dec 12, 2002	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Jun 27, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 27, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 27, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—