Drawing for PATRIOT SPORTSWEAR

USPTO serial 76315798

PATRIOT SPORTSWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATRIOT SPORTSWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD J. BARTZ

RICHARD J BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ PA6750 FRANCE AVE S STE 350EDINA, MN 55435-1983UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025polo shirts and oxford shirts exclusive of uniformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 23, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 20, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 20, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance