USPTO serial 76315835
BBK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BBK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southfield, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Helmholdt
THOMAS D HELMHOLDT YOUNG & BASILE, PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TURNAROUND MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY CORPORATE RENEWAL, OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT, INTERIM MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING, LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES, AND PRODUCT AND SUPPLIER ANALYSIS, ALL FOR TROUBLED COMPANIES | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |