Drawing for G CINEMA GOLDEN CHOICE

USPTO serial 76315875

G CINEMA GOLDEN CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G CINEMA GOLDEN CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet Y. Shih

LINDA G HENRY FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Cable, wireless cable, satellite and television broadcasting and transmission servicesACTIVE—
041Cable, wireless cable, satellite and television programming featuring news, education, entertainment, leisure activities, sports, and cultural topics and activitiesACTIVE—
042Providing news, politics, family life information by means of a global communications network; providing computer search engine services for others, namely, creating indexes of information, data, sites and other resources, available via a global computer network and computer databases; searching and retrieving information, data, sites and other resources available via a global computer network, and computer databases; computer services, namely providing search engines for obtaining information and data on a global computer network; computer services, namely designing and implementing web sites for others and hosting web sites of others in a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance