Drawing for NUTRIS

USPTO serial 76316670

NUTRIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NUTRIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SYLVIA A. PETROSKY

SYLVIA A PETROSKY2273 SMITH RDAKRON, OH 44333-2924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations; vitamins; nutritional supplements, namely, nutraceutical preparations including extracts, isolates and concentrates; and foods and components of foods as nutritional supplements and for medically restricted dietsACTIVE—
029Health foods, namely, essential and edible oils; and essential and edible oils contained in soy based, grain based and vegetable based beverages; processed edible seeds, namely, flax seed, canola seed, sunflower seed, hemp seed, and safflower seed; processed edible pulse, namely, soybeans, lentils, chick peas, field peas and other grain legumes; processed edible legumes; and processed edible grains, namely, barley, wheat, triticale and oatsACTIVE—
030Breakfast cereal; processed cereal; cereal, plant and vegetable based snack food and baked goods; and floursACTIVE—
031Unprocessed cereal; oil seeds, namely, flax seed, canola seed, sunflower seed, hemp seed, and safflower seed; pulse, namely soybeans, lentils, chick peas, field peas and other grain legumes; legumes; and grains, namely, barley, wheat, triticale, oats and other cereals; all for human and animal consumptionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 17, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance