Drawing for PAPERLESS PATENT DRAWING

USPTO serial 76316714

PAPERLESS PATENT DRAWING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAPERLESS PATENT DRAWING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Phillip Chandler, III

JAMES PHILLIP CHANDLER THE CHANDLER LAW FIRM10621 RIV RDPOTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely electronic transmission of voice, data, information and imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 15, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 18, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance