USPTO serial 76316717
PAPERLESS PATENT DRAWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAPERLESS PATENT DRAWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Phillip Chandler, III
JAMES PHILLIP CHANDLER THE CHANDLER LAW FIRM10621 RIV RDPOTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods and services, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |