Drawing for CITY VALET

USPTO serial 76316744

CITY VALET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CITY VALET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D ST LANDAU

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1208

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016CORRUGATED, CARDBOARD AND PAPER BOXES USED TO DELIVER, DROP OFF AND PICK UP CLOTHING AND ITEMS TO BE CLEANED AND REPAIREDACTIVE—
037LAUNDROMAT AND DRY CLEANING SERVICESACTIVE—
039PICK-UP AND DELIVERY OF LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING AND ITEMS TO BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED BY MEANS OF TRUCK, VAN OR CARACTIVE—
040TAILORING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance