USPTO serial 76316789
DYNOFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3497468Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2008
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNOFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N-5861 Bergen, NO
N-5861 Bergen, NO
N-5861 Bergen, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drying machines for industrial use, and machines for use in industrial drying systems; motors and engines for drying machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | DRYING SYSTEMS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE COMPRISED OF NON-ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL DRYERS FOR HEATING PRODUCT AND EVAPORATING MOISTURE AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED IN DRYING SYSTEMS FOR PROCESS CONTROL AND MONITORING; INDUSTRIAL DRYERS FOR HEATING AND DEHUMIDIFYING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Stord Norway AS
- Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Stord Norway AS
- Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Stord Norway AS
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named DYNOFLASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |