USPTO serial 76316792
CRYOCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2872889Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2004
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYOCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-40724 Hilden, DE
D-40724 Hilden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Ableman Abelman Frayne & Schwab150 E 42nd StreetFloor 26New York, NY 10017-5612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, deep-frozen primary neuronal cells for use in neurobiological research, drug discovery, toxicological studies; frozen cells, excluding sperm cells, for scientific and research use | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, deep-frozen primary neuronal cells for use in drug screening | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 24, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |