USPTO serial 76317118
MYCOMETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUMONT, GREGORY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYCOMETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Copenhagen K, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Finn Martensen
FINN MARTENSEN MARTENSEN WRIGHT, LLP112 J ST FL 2SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-2200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical diagnostic kits for detection and qualification of microbiological loadings in indoor environments and water systems; chemical test kits for examination of buildings and water systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring apparatuses, controls, measuring instruments and controlling instruments for detection and qualification of microbiological loadings in indoor environments and water systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical and chemical research, and consulting services in the field of detection, qualification and combating microbiological loadings in indoor environments and water systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |