USPTO serial 76317292
BONDGRAPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BONDGRAPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernhard Kreten
BERNHARD KRETEN BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ & ASSOCIATES1331 GARDEN HWY STE 300SACRAMENTO, CA 95833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs in the fields of engineering and computer simulation of dynamic systems that are comprised of interrelated modules | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |