USPTO serial 76317339
ETULAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETULAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N Owen
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET STSTE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY, MECHANICAL TOYS; SKETCHING TOYS; SOFT SCULPTURE PLUSH TOYS; SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS; SQUEEZABLE SQUEAKING TOYS; SQUEEZE TOYS; STUFFED TOYS; TALKING TOYS; MUSIC BOX TOYS; MUSICAL TOYS; PLUSH TOYS; TOY GUNS, TOY ARROWS; TOY WEAPONS; POP UP TOYS; PRINTING TOYS; NON-RIDING TRANSPORTATION TOYS; CONSTRUCTION TOYS; BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; BATH TOYS; BATTERY OPERATED ACTION TOYS; BENDABLE TOYS; CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; CHILDREN'S WIRE CONSTRUCTION AND ART ACTIVITY TOYS; TRANSFORMING ROBOTIC TOYS; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; WIND-UP TOYS; WIND-UP WALKING TOYS; BOARD GAMES; CARD GAMES; JIGSAW PUZZLES; MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES; HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS; TOY MODEL HOBBYCRAFT KITS; ROLE-PLAYING GAMES; PINBALL GAMES; YO-YOS; PARLOR GAMES; DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING, AND DOLL ACCESSORIES; PUPPETS; TOY FIGURES; TOY MOLDING COMPOUNDS; TOY VEHICLES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; RADIO-CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFORE; CRIB TOYS; DISC TOSS TOYS; FLYING DISC TOYS; DRAWING TOYS; ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS; FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS; FLYING SAUCERS; INFANT ACTION CRIB TOYS; INFANT DEVELOPMENT TOYS; INFANT TOYS; INFLATABLE RIDE-ON TOYS; INFLATABLE TOYS; PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS; PLASTIC CHARACTER TOYS; PULL TOYS; PUNCHING TOYS; PUSH TOYS; RIDE-ON TOYS; RUBBER CHARACTER TOYS; SAND TOYS; SANDBOX TOYS; TOYS DESIGNED TO BE ATTACHED TO CAR SEATS, STROLLERS, CRIBS, AND HIGH CHAIRS; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; WIND-UP TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETULAS PRODUCTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ETULAS PRODUCTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LGI Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ETULAS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |