USPTO serial 76317340
ETULAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETULAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING DRAMA, COMEDY, ANIMATION, AND EDUCATION, AND INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTH, WELLNESS, ETHICS, AND PERSONAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; PRERECORDED RECORDS, AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, VIDEOS, CD-ROMS, AND DVD'S FEATURING DRAMA, COMEDY, ANIMATION, MUSIC, AND EDUCATION AND INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTH, WELLNESS, ETHICS, AND PERSONAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |