USPTO serial 76317341
ETULAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETULAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMINS AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETULAS PRODUCTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ETULAS PRODUCTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LGI Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ETULAS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |