USPTO serial 76317358
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
SANYO SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
ALLENDALE, NJ
San Marino, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD E WAWRZYNIAK
RICHARD E WAWRZYNIAK FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE ST FL 16CHICAGO, IL 60603-3403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Consumer electronic devices and software for use in the wireless transmission and reception of broadband and narrowband content such as video, voice and/or data; Chips and chip sets for use in the transmission and reception of video, voice and/or data between broadband and narrowband network devices, consumer electronic products, multi function set top boxes and/or home and office computing platforms within a wireless local area network system; Computer chips; Multi-function set top boxes for use in the wireless transmission and reception of broadband and narrowband content such as video, voice and/or data; Communications hardware and/or software in the form of a gateway for the transmission, reception, and routing of video, voice and/or data in a digital form across a wireless network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Licensing of intellectual property; patent licensing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |