USPTO serial 76317477
BOTANICAL INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOTANICAL INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert H. Finn
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, PCSTE 250077 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1732Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, namely hand soaps, perfumed soaps, and moisturizing soaps; perfumes; colognes; eaux de toilette; essential oils for personal use, namely perfumed oils and aromatherapy oils; hair care preparations, namely shampoos, conditioning treatments, lotions, hair sprays, hair bleach, mousse and gels; non-medicated cosmetics, namely makeup and skin care preparations for moisturizing, cleansing and improving the appearance of the body and face, namely, face, hand, body, and foot creams, lotions, toners, gels and scrubs, anti-wrinkle and anti-aging preparations, creams and lotions for cellulite reduction, facial makeup, foundation creams and lotions, face powder, blush and rouge, eye makeup, eye liners, eye shadows, mascara, lipsticks, lip glosses, lip pencils, lip liners and nail enamels; oral hygiene products, namely tooth paste and non-medicated mouth wash or rinse; personal deodorants; bath and shower products, namely bath salts, bath crystals, bath oils, bath milks and bath gels; room fragrances, namely perfumed room sprays, fragrance emitting wicks, scented ceramic stones, incense, and scented wood chips; scented potpourris; and products for scented linen and lingerie, namely, sachets and scented water for use in irons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BOTANICAL INTELLIGENCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |