USPTO serial 76317526
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosemary S. Tarlton
MICHAEL S UMANSKY LINDOWS INC9333 GENESSE AVE 3RD FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, OPERATING SYSTEMS PROGRAMS AND UTILITIES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |