Drawing for LINDOWS.COM

USPTO serial 76317536

LINDOWS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LINDOWS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Benassi, Esq.

MICHAEL S UMANSKY ESQ LINDOWS INC9333 GENESSE AVE STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, in both packaged and downloadable form, used for word processing, creating and manipulating spreadsheets, audio, visual and multimedia presentations, electronic mail, calendaring, scheduling, desktop publishing, computer aided design, and project management; and computer operating programs and computer utility programsABANDONED
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software used for word processing, creating and manipulating spreadsheets, audio, visual and multimedia presentations, electronic mail, calendaring, scheduling, desktop publishing, computer aided design; and providing information and computer consultation in the field of operating systems and computer software via a websiteABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 27, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 24, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 22, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 22, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 22, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 18, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 16, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 5, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance