Drawing for TREVO

USPTO serial 76317554

TREVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan T. Brown, Paul L. Sharer, Mark G. Paulson, Richard A. Steinberg, Christopher M. Beck, and Richard M. Assmus

SUSAN T BROWN, PAUL L SHARER, MARK G MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP1909 K ST NWINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALS AND BIOCHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD; AND CHEMICALS AND BIOCHEMICALS FOR PRESERVING FOODSTUFFACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance