USPTO serial 76317694
PERFECT FOR THOSE TIMES WHEN A COOKIE IS NOT ENOUGH AND CANDY IS TOO MUCH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECT FOR THOSE TIMES WHEN A COOKIE IS NOT ENOUGH AND CANDY IS TOO MUCH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK CELLA30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 38NEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Foods and ingredients of foods, namely, snack cakes, cupcakes, treats, tarts, chips, cereal, baking mixes an ingredients, ice bards, energy bars, packaged meals, packaged combination meals with other foods and dessert/snack items;bakery goods; mixes for making bakery goods; edible cake decorations; cake mixes; cakes; pies; candied fruits; candied fruit snacks;candied nuts; candy cake decorations; candy coated popcorn; caramel popcorn; caramels; cereals based snack food; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts;chocolate powder; chocolate syrup; chocolate topping; chocolate truffles; chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; cocoa; cocoa mixes; cones for ice cream; confectionery chips for baking;frozen confections; cookies; crackers; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; frozen custards; Danish pastries; dessert souffles; doughnuts; dumplings; eclairs; flavoring syrup; food flavorings using non-essential oils;chocolate fondue; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler; food bars ready-to-eat cereal derived; frosting mixes; frostings; frozen yogurt; candied fruit; fruit ice; fruit pies; candied fruit snacks; flavored and sweetened gelatins; gingerbread; glazed popcorn; granola; granola-based snack bars; hot chocolate; ice cream; ice cream substitute;soy-based ice cream substitute; ice milk; flavored ices; icing; icing mixes; marshmallow toppings;milkshakes; bases for making milkshakes; candy mints; molasses; muffins; nuts, parfaits; pastries; peanut butter confectionery chips; pies; popped popcorn; processed popcorn; pretzels; puddings; puffed corn snacks;sauces;seasonings;sherbet;granola-based snack bars; cereal-based snacks;sauces; seasoning;sherbet;granola-based snack bars; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods;sorbet; syrup flavoring; syrup flavoring syrup topping; tapioca; thickening agents for use in cooking; topping syrup; wafers;yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |