USPTO serial 76317738
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto M1C 5E8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lile H. Deinard
LILE H DEINARD DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177-0001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS DEVICES, NAMELY, HANDHELD PERSONAL COMPUTERS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, PAGERS, AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS FOR RECEIVING INFORMATION, PARTICULARLY CONCERNING BUSINESS, PERSONAL, RECREATIONAL, ENTERTAINMENT, EDUCATIONAL AND SPORTING MATTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING BUSINESS INFORMATION, NAMELY, BUSINESS DIRECTORIES FEATURING RESTAURANTS, BARS, HOTEL, SPA, BEAUTY, TELEPHONE DIRECTORY, REAL ESTATE AND TRAVEL SERVICES, ONLINE DATING AND INTRODUCTION SERVICES AND SHOPPERS' GUIDE INFORMATION, RELATING TO A PARTICULAR GEOGRAPHIC AREA, BY WIRELESS TRANSMISSION TO WIRELESS DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING TRAVEL AND TOURIST INFORMATION RELATING TO A PARTICULAR GEOGRAPHIC AREA, BY WIRELESS TRANSMISSION TO WIRELESS DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTING INFORMATION, NAMELY, INFORMATION CONCERNING MUSIC, PERFORMING ARTS, THEATER, MOVIE, VISUAL ARTS, RECREATION AND SPORTS, RELATING TO A PARTICULAR GEOGRAPHIC AREA, BY WIRELESS TRANSMISSION TO WIRELESS DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |