Drawing for MERCER ACCESS

USPTO serial 76317778

MERCER ACCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERCER ACCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janene Bassett

JANENE BASSETT SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP333 S HOPE ST 48TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1448UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for creating marketing templates, websites and e-cards for orthodontics, periodontics, oral surgery, prosthodontics, pediatric dentistry and endodontics practicesACTIVEJul 25, 2001
016business forms including printed referral documents, practice brochures, and patient careguides for orthodontics, periodontics, oral surgery, prosthodontics, pediatric dentistry and endodontics practicesACTIVEJul 25, 2001
042computer software design for others, namely, creating and designing software for template, marketing, and referral documents for orthodontics, periodontics, oral surgery, prosthodontics, pediatric dentistry and endodontics practicesACTIVEJul 25, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 11, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 28, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 19, 2005FAXXFAX SENT—
Jan 19, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 30, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance