USPTO serial 76317825
KAREN MICHAELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAREN MICHAELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Stambul
RICHARD A STAMBUL LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD A STAMBULSTE 35010350 SANTA MONICA BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, trousers, pants, shorts, Capri's, leggings, jeans, blouses, polo shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, tanks, camisoles, body shirts, tee shirts, skirts, jumpsuits, jackets, dresses, dress suits, business suits, evening dresses, anoraks, slacks, coats, swimming suits, one piece dresses, two piece dresses, blousons, silk scarves, shawls, and sweaters, namely, cardigans, vests, and pullovers, and leather and suede clothes, namely, pants, skirts, shirts, jackets, and leather belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |