USPTO serial 76318049
DOWNEY LTD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOWNEY LTD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & WESTERN, LLPP O BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | FITTED TONNEAU COVERS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |