USPTO serial 76318201
DANCE VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DANCE VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1446 WH PURMEREND, NL
1446 WH PURMEREND, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD's and records featuring music | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely T-shirts, trousers, jackets, hats, caps and shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail clothing store services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting dances, parties, and musical performances; disc jockey services; music publishing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amsterdance Beheer B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Amsterdance Beheer B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DANCE VALLEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |