Drawing for WILD 'N FRUITY GUMMY MUMMIES

USPTO serial 76318325

WILD 'N FRUITY GUMMY MUMMIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COREA, ANDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD 'N FRUITY GUMMY MUMMIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent Raden

KENT RADEN MILLER & MARTINVOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVE STE 1000CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030candyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 17, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Sep 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance