Drawing for KAREN ROBERTS

USPTO serial 76318352

KAREN ROBERTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAREN ROBERTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Stambul

RICHARD A STAMBUL LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD A STAMBULSTE 35010350 SANTA MONICA BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothes, namely, trousers, pants, shorts, capris, leggings, jeans, blouses, polo shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, tank tops, camisoles, body shirts, tee shirts, skirts, jumpsuits, jackets, dresses, dress suits, business suits, evening dresses, anoraks, slacks, coats, swimming suits, one piece dresses, two piece dresses, blouson, silk scarves, shawls, and sweaters, namely, cardigans, vests, and pullovers, and leather and suede clothes, namely, pants, skirts, shirts, jackets, and leather beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance