Drawing for DETAIL WIZARD

USPTO serial 76318598

DETAIL WIZARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DETAIL WIZARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Lawrence Buckley

R LAWRENCE BUCKLEY THE TORO COMPANY8111 LYNDALE AVE SBLOOMINGTON, MN 55420-1136UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021CLEANING TOOLS FOR DETAILING LUXURY VEHICLES, NAMELY, MOPS, DUSTERS, AND PLASTIC PIECES FOR HOLDING CLOTHS, COLLECTIVELY FOR SALE AS A KIT TO CONSUMERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 1, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 20, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 25, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 6, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 6, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance