USPTO serial 76318697
PLUSOPTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PLUSOPTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
90411 Nurnberg, DE
90411 NUERNBERG, DE
90411 Nurnberg, DE
90411 NUERNBERG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
Miriam D. Trudell Davis Graham & Stubbs LLC3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700Denver, CO 80205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ APPARATUS FOR TESTING DRIVER CAPABILITY, namely, DEVICES FOR DETERMINING REFRACTION, DRUG/ALCOHOLIC ABUSE PARTICULARLY DYNAMICS IN GAZE/PUPIL/ACCOMMODATION ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | SURGICAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL AND VETERINARY APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY APPARATUS FOR EXAMINATION OF PROFESSIONAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA, ALSO KNOWN AS PATIENT DIAGNOSTIC AND SCREENING DEVICES SPECIFICALLY VISION TESTERS, REFRACTOMETERS, PUPILOMETERS, SQUINT/GAZE DETECTORS, DEVICES FOR MEASURING ACCOMMODATION; SCIENTIFIC, ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY REFRACTION APPARATUS, ALSO KNOWN AS VISION DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENTS, SPECIFICALLY VIDEO RETINOSCOPES; APPARATUS TO DETECT REFRACTION, RETINOSCOPES, PUPILOMETERS, DEVICES FOR MEASURING THE GAZE, DEVICES FOR MEASURING ACCOMMODATION, DEVICES FOR MEASURING STRABISMUS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [ INSTALLATION, MOUNTING, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS FOR RESEARCH IN LABORATORIES AND OF DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND OPTICS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING FOR HANDLING SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS FOR RESEARCH IN LABORATORIES AND OF DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND OPTICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ (Based on 44(e)) COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH SERVICES OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR THIRD PARTIES; DEVELOPMENT, RESEARCH AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND OPTICS AND THE PERTAINING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by plusoptiX AG
- Other trademarks owned by PLUSOPTIX GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by plusoptiX AG
- Other trademarks owned by PLUSOPTIX GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PLUSOPTIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |