Drawing for CLEEN

USPTO serial 76318761

CLEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H COX

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH & COX355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003toilet soap, bath salts, bubble bath, perfume, toilet water, cologne, lipsticks, nail polishes, make-up creams, skin cleansing milk, body and face powders, skin cleansing lotions and creams, eye-liner, after shave lotion, shaving soap, personal deodorants, hair lotions and talcum powderACTIVE—
016magazines dealing with fashion, music, entertainment, health, lifestyle, automobiles and other motorized vehicles, athletic equipment, electronic equipment, electronic gadgets, exercise equipment, cameras, clothing, accessories, jewelry and other topics of general interestACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, shirts, vests, sweaters, shoes, caps, bandannas, shorts, sweat shirts, pants, belts for clothing, socks, swim wear, jackets, rain wear, blouses, dresses, footwear, hosiery, scarves, hats, head bands, pajamas and sleep wearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 10, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance