USPTO serial 76318939
REBEL IV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REBEL IV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Anne Keefe
Sarah Anne Keefe Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC1201 West Peachtree Street, Suite 3500P. O. Box 7037, Atlanta, GA 30357-0037Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | grass seed | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |