Drawing for WHAT MEN TRULY WANT

USPTO serial 76319070

WHAT MEN TRULY WANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHAT MEN TRULY WANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Harrison

MARK B HARRISON VENABLE1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005-6197UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES IN THE FIELD OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, MATCHMAKING AND HELPING PEOPLE MEET OTHER PEOPLEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance